Community Services | ||||
Development Permit Board |
CITY OFVANCOUVER | |||
|
Development Permit Staff Committee Report
Development Permit Staff Committee Members |
Present: | Also Present: |
B. Boons (Chair), Development Services |
M.B. Rondeau,
Urban Design & Dev. Planning |
Applicant |
Owner of Development |
Grosvenor Canada Ltd. |
Nigel
Baldwin Architects |
[top]
● Proposal:To construct
a 6-storey mixed-use building comprised of three storeys of retail/
commercial, three stories of artist live/work, class A studios (92
units) and three and a partial fourth levels of underground parking.
See Appendix
A Standard Conditions
Appendix B Standard Notes and Conditions of Development Permit
Appendix
C Processing Centre Building
and Fire & Rescue Services comments
Appendix
D Plans and Elevations
Appendix
E Applicants Design Rationale
and Response to Preliminary Conditions of Approval
Appendix F Applicants view analysis (comparison with preliminary application)
Appendix G Applicants meeting notes from public consultation with XL Lofts
residents
(Apendices D - G are not included - copies of the full report may be obtained from the Planning Department)
● Issues: No Issues
● Urban
Design Panel: Support
THAT the Board APPROVE Development Application No. DE407357 as submitted, the plans and information forming a part thereof, thereby permitting the construction of a six (6) storey mixed use building comprised of 3-storeys of retail/commercial, three (3) levels of artist live/work class A studios (92 units) and three and a partial fourth levels of underground parking, subject to the following conditions:
Note to Applicant: This should be shown on the drawings (see also condition A.1.15).
Note to Applicant: The drinking fountain
should be moved slightly to be located on public property (see condition
A.2.20 for maintenance agreement). The street lighting source on the
south side of
[top]
|
PERMITTED (MAXIMUM) |
REQUIRED |
PROPOSED |
Site Size |
- |
- |
386.2 ft.
x 259.7 ft. |
Site Area |
- |
- |
100,300
sq. ft. |
Floor Area1 |
300,900
sq. ft. |
- |
Residential 91,156
sq. ft. Commercial 212,052
sq. ft. Total 303,208
sq. ft. |
FSR1 |
outright 1.0 FSR conditional 3.0 FSR |
- |
3.02 FSR |
Height2 |
outright 30.2 ft. conditional unspecified |
- |
Cambie frontage 37.8 ft. Highest point on North top of Elevator Machine Room (SE) 75.0 ft. |
Parking3 |
- |
Residential 121
spaces Commercial 481 spaces Total 602 spaces |
Residential 121 spaces Commercial 586 spaces Total 707 spaces |
Loading |
- - |
Class A 0
spaces Class B 10 spaces |
Class A 0 spaces Class B 11 spaces |
Bicycle |
- - |
Residential 101
spaces Commercial 20
spaces Total Class A 121
spaces Residential 6
spaces Commercial 6
spaces Total Class B 12 spaces |
Residential 115 spaces Commercial 26 spaces Total Class A 141
spaces Residential 6
spaces Commercial 6 spaces Total Class B 12
spaces |
Amenity |
10,000 sq.
ft. (max.) |
- |
1,271 sq.
ft. |
Balconies |
Open 24,068 sq. ft. Enclosed 12,034 sq. ft. |
- |
Open 4,443 sq. ft. Enclosed 0 sq. ft. |
1 Note on Floor Area and FSR: The proposed floor area is above the maximum
permitted. Standard Condition
A.1.1 seeks compliance with the maximum permitted floor area in the
C-3A District Schedule.
2 Notes on Height: The Development Permit
Board may permit an increase in the height of the building beyond 30.2
ft. Pursuant to the Cambie Street Eastside C-3A
Guidelines, the suggested height maximum is 90.2 ft.
3 Notes
on Parking Spaces: The
Commercial parking space requirement is based on the Grocery Store
and the Retail use requirements as indicated in the Parking By-law.
The parking requirement may change depending on the floor area designated
for other proposed commercial use. Standard
Condition A.1.4 seeks confirmation of the other proposed uses.
|
RECOMMENDED |
PROPOSED |
Section 4.3 Height |
Building frontage along the east side of The remaining portion of the building is set back
25 ft and shall have a maximum height of 90.2 ft. |
The massing of the complete development application
is generally scaled down from the preliminary, approved application.
The height of the preliminary development application was 95.4
ft. For the complete development application, the proposed maximum
height is lower by approx. 10 ft. This slightly lower height
provides the sense of street enclosure of a principal building
sought in the guidelines but also improves some views for top
floor units of the XL lofts and therefore staff support this
lower height. |
[top]
Legal Description | History of Application |
Block: 18 |
03 05
12 Approved in Principle
by the DP Board |
● Site: The site
is a full block located between
Industrial
I-1 zoning is located to the east across
(b) Canadian
Tire Site, DE 407204 approved for an expanded store plus retail tenant
over nearly the full block of Cambie, 7th Avenue, 6th Avenue and Yukon
Street
(c) Dicksons
Coffee,
(d) Wendys Drive
Thru,
[top]
On
Staff
have reviewed the revised view analysis and consider that the proposal
has met and exceeded this condition.
Response
from Staff:
1.3 design development to improve the
Staff have reviewed the bus shelter location proposed and find that it will be too far away from the curb to be useable to transit patrons. A foundation has already been poured for the new glass bus shelters in an optimum location, closer to the curb. Staff suggest that this shelter location be shown on the drawings (condition A.2.21) and that the steps now shown behind the proposed bus shelter be leveled out to the sidewalk grades, and reduce the number of steps at that entrance to the proposed grocery store. This will avoid the dropped area now shown in this area.
1.4 arrangements
to the satisfaction of General Manager of Engineering Services and
the Director of Legal Services for the provision prior to the first
occupancy of the following:
Response
from Staff: This condition has been met.
Response
from Staff: There has been significant reduction in the massing along
1.11 that
the Central Broadway C-3A Urban Design Guideline be carefully reviewed
as to its relation to the project;
Response from
Applicant Team:
Staff
have reviewed the height, massing, views suggested by these guidelines
and this proposal does not interfere with any of these provisions.
1.12 further
consideration and evaluation of the appropriate parking count for this
project, in line with similar inner city commercial parking provisions
and meeting the Citys transportation goals;
Response
from Staff:
1.13 when
the complete application is submitted, the developer to deliver a commitment
not to expand or consolidate the retail to big box but that the major
retail tenants be generally as proposed in the preliminary submission;
Response
from Staff:
The primary issues of use, density, massing, views and traffic were resolved at the preliminary development application stage subject to conditions. Staff have reviewed the complete development application against those conditions and find that they have generally been met or exceeded.
- pedestrian oriented configuration of retail to the street (no internal mall) and pedestrian amenity on the streets,
- a
significant, landscaped promenade open space on
- traffic and transportation contributions,
- greenway
improvements and bicycle hub on
- sustainable building efforts with landscaped roof and stormwater retention,
- provision
of one unit for the artist residency program.
Minor
improvements are requested to finalize this development application under
the conditions noted. Staff consider that the conditionally requested
increases to density and height have been well earned and recommend approval
of this complete development application.
The
Urban Design Panel reviewed this application on
EVALUATION: SUPPORT (8-0)
· Introduction:
· Panels Comments: The Panel unanimously supported this application. The Panel found it to be an excellent response
to the urban design issues and noted major improvements to the scheme
since the preliminary stage. The
Panel acknowledged that it is a major challenge to develop a full block
with such a program and commended the architect for an exciting response
to dealing with large retail tenant spaces without creating large blank
walls.
The Panel liked the simplicity of the central
open space for the ALW residents and found it very appropriate. There was a recommendation to consider the
relationship of the amenity room to the green space to the south and
to avoid the step if possible. A
comment was made that it is unfortunate the space fails to have a view
to the north. The Panel believes the courtyard will be very
well used by the tenants and recommended including electrical outlets
and gas lines to enhance its usability. One
Panel member commented that the walkways feel somewhat tight and suggested
reallocating some of the central green area to increasing the space between
the units.
The Panel noted
that while the ALW component represents about a third of the whole project,
the residential entrances on
Several Panel
members were not convinced that the proposed colour scheme will be successful,
finding the grey too dark and overwhelming. It
was suggested there may be opportunity for some variation in colour with
a full block development such as this and to introduce warmer colours.
The applicant
was commended for the serious commitment to sustainability.
Other comments
included:
-
the retail corners dominate the project;
-
the
-
the least successful corner is
7th/Yukon with the diagonal glazing;
-
the edge treatment of the ALWS
decks will be very important;
-
hope the signage will not dominate.
· Applicants Response: Mr. Baldwin thanked the Panel for the input. With respect to the suggestion to incorporate more playfulness, he commented it is a very large project and if it is broken down too much it begins to look even bigger and chunkier.
[top]
Engineering staff
are coordinating closely with this applicant and the applicants for
the Canadian Tire redevelopment with respect to off-site traffic issues. A design for
Engineering Services
notes the applicant has significantly reduced the number of parking
spaces from the preliminary application, and supports the amount of
parking spaces over the minimum required.
The
recommendations of Engineering Services are contained in the prior-to
conditions noted in Appendix A attached to this report.
The applicant team have
been closely coordinating with the City and with the developers of
the adjacent Canadian Tire site to achieve a high quality of coordinated
public realm along the West 7th Greenway and along
See
staff response to preliminary conditions 1.6 and 1.7, pages 8 & 9,
and standard conditions A.1.15 and A.1.16.
[top]
This Development Application submission was reviewed
at the Preliminary Application stage, and preliminary comments were
provided to the applicant in the
[top]
The VCHA advises the applicant to take note of the following:
(i) Detailed
drawings of food/retail spaces are to be submitted for review by the
Environmental Health Division for compliance with Health By-law #6580
and the Food Premises Regulation prior to construction.
The comments of Fire and Rescue Services are contained
in Appendix C attached to this report.
Following the preliminary Development Permit Board approval
on
[top]
The
Committee commended the applicant team on its design response to preliminary
conditions of approval. The Committee felt the extensive design revisions
met and exceeded its expectations, and that the increases sought to
height and density are well earned.
The
Committee notes the public consultation process conducted by the applicant
following the preliminary approval, which resulted in design changes
that respond effectively to view concerns raised by neighbours.
[top]
The following
is a list of conditions that must also be met prior to issuance of the
Development Permit.
A.1 Standard
Conditions
A.1.1
compliance with Section 4.7.1 (Floor Space Ratio) of the C-3A District
Schedule of the Zoning and Development By-law;
Note to Applicant: Alcoves and gross cross-sectional area of stairs
are included in floor area calculations.
A.1.2
submission of a letter of undertaking signed by the owner(s) regarding
the furnishing and availability of all amenity areas for all residential
occupants of the building;
A.1.3
clarification of the uses of all rooms/spaces;
A.1.4
confirmation on the proposed commercial uses;
Note to Applicant: The "proposed future Fitness Centre" needs
clarification. If a fitness centre is intended, additional Environmental
Health and Building By-law clearances may be required. Additionally,
the parking calculations for this use differ from other commercial
uses.
A.1.5 arrangements
to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and the Director of Legal
Services to not expand or consolidate the retail to big box and to retain
the major retail tenants generally as proposed this submission;
Standard Landscape Conditions
A.1.6 provide details
of the
A.1.7 design development to provide a greener edge
along
Note
to Applicant: Planting on
the inside boulevard must conform to the City of
A.1.8 provision of a large scale section (
Note
to Applicant: The cross-section should illustrate the roof slab
and the tree planting depths
A.1.9 delete reference to stairs shown in the Cambie
and
Note
to Applicant: Architectural
elevations on Pages A001 and A301 show a set of stairs while the Landscape Plan does not
A.1.10 clarification of the scale noted for the Landscape Plan
Note
to Applicant: The plans
are a 1/16 inch scale and the notation indicates 1/8 inch scale
A.1.11 clarification of the symbols used in the Plant
List; an
Note to Applicant: The symbols do not appear to match the plant
names
Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design
(CPTED)
A.1.12 design development
to provide full separation between commercial and residential parking
areas
A.1.13 design development to reduce opportunities for
mischief through minimizing exit alcoves
Social Planning/Housing Centre and Cultural
Affairs
A.1.14 arrangements
shall be made, to the satisfaction of the Directors of the Office of
Cultural Affairs, Housing Centre, Planning and Legal Services for a registered
agreement to secure one artist live/work studio unit of sufficient size
and suitable location including associated off-street parking, to be
operated under the Citys Artists Residency Award Program and subleased
to a deserving artist at the maximum shelter allowance under the BC Income
Assistance Program
Note to Applicant: The applicant is encouraged to meet with the
Office of Cultural Affairs to agree on a sufficient and suitable location
for the designated unit.
A.1.15 arrangements
to be made, in consultation with the Office of Cultural Affairs, for
the selection of an artist to undertake the enhancement of the public
realm areas (see also condition 1.2)
A.2 Standard
Engineering Condition
A.2.1 arrangements
to the satisfaction of General Manager of Engineering Services and the
Director of Legal Services for the provision of the following:
a) traffic
signal installation at
b) curb
modifications and associated street work surrounding the site as a result
of traffic improvements that may be required (100 percent applicant funded)
c) traffic signal modifications at
e) payment
of $30,000, representing 60% of the expected cost of implementing traffic
calming
Note to Applicant: Apportionment
of the pro rated fair share of off-site transportation costs is based
on the floor space of the proposed development and Canadian Tire developments.
A.2.2 design development to modify
the entry/exit lane onto
Note to Applicant: Engineering does not support provision of 2
exit lanes onto
Note to Applicant: The Loading Management Plan should address the recommendations of the Loading
Bay Management comments in the ND Lea report. It
should also clarify the longest and tallest
semi-trailer, beyond a WB15, which may be expected to serve this site.
The applicants consultant
shall also confirm the ability of this maximum length of truck to execute
all turns on surrounding streets
serving as the access/delivery route to the loading facilities on this
site without requiring changes to on-street
regulations. In addition, documentation should be provided to confirm that the number of compactors
and recycling containers provided is sufficient for the large retail
uses and additional compactors for cardboard recycling or garbage will
not be required and occupy required loading spaces. Please contact Paul Pinsker of the Parking Branch at 604-873-7217 for further
clarification.
A.2.5 compliance with Section
4 Parking Spaces, of the Parking By-law, to the satisfaction of the
General Manager of Engineering Services;
Note to Applicant:
(a) Provision of disability parking spaces
within the residential parking area and provision of the required 7.5
ft. (2.3 m) of unobstructed vertical clearance into these spaces and
associated manoeuvring aisles; and
(b) three (3) disabled parking spaces are required for 95 residential
parking stalls. One of these can be within the visitor parking area.
If these spaces are not located very close to the elevator, the 7.5
ft. (2.3 m) clearance must extend to the elevator. This harmonizes
with the requirements of the Building Code.
A.2.6 clarification of the visitor parking requirement;
Note to Applicant: There should be no more than 18 visitor parking
spaces based upon a provision
of 92 artist live
work class A studios.
A.2.7 relocation of the loading space for the north retail loading and
make adjustments to the Class B north
retail loading space as necessary.
Note to Applicant: Switch the location of this semi trailer loading space with that of
the adjacent garbage compactor
to improved egress from this space. It
will be necessary to move this
space further back to avoid conflict with the adjacent Class B loading
space.
A.2.8 clarification and clearly
note on plans the length of ramp at the specified slope and design
elevations on both sides of the parking ramp at all break points;
A.2.9 provision of access doors
into the rear of all commercial retail units fronting onto
A.2.10 modification
of the parking layout;
Note
to Applicant:
a) angle parking spaces R92 and 2001/2002 & 3001/3002
to improve access and egress; and
b) delete parking space 1162 otherwise vehicles
manoeuvring into this parking space would obstruct vehicles attempting
to enter the parking ramp.
A.2.11 clarification of the access
path for the commercial retail units along
Note
to Applicant: The retail units on either side of the entrance
to the major retail tenant #3 dont
appear to have any access to loading.
A.2.12 clarification of what is
represented by the dotted lines through parking stalls 2164 through
2167 on parking level 2.
A.2.13 provision of direction signage within the commercial parking
areas to the satisfaction of the General
Manager of Engineering Services;
Note to Applicant: This is to assist customers
to find their vehicle quickly and easily with good reference points
and appropriate signage.
A.2.14 correction of some design and building grades;
Note
to Applicant: Some design and building grades are shown incorrectly. Please
review the sheet 102 and clarify proposed entry and stair grades
at these locations. Steps and excessive ramp grades may be created
by the proposed entry grades in order to meet the building grades.
A.2.15 arrangements
shall be made, to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Engineering Services, and the Subdivision Approving Officer,
for the dedication of the west 5 ft. of Block 18, Explanatory Plan 17949
and the east 4 ft. of the northerly 122 ft. of Block 18, Explanatory Plan
9619, for road widening purposes.
A.2.16 arrangements
to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Engineering Services for
relocation or abandonment of the 8 inch combined sewer
located mid-site running west to east;
Note to Applicant: Please contact Engineering Sewers Design to
discuss options. Please provide
residential and commercial population estimates to determine sanitary
sewer capacity.
A.2.17 illustrate property lines on elevations
to clearly show that the roof does not encroach;
Note to Applicant: Drawing A301, Cambie elevation still shows
the roof encroachment.
A.2.18 design and location
of all crossings, to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Engineering Services;
A.2.19 arrangements shall be made to the satisfaction of the General Manager
of Engineering Services, for street
trees and special sidewalk treatment.
A.2.20 arrangements to the satisfaction of the General
Manager of Engineering Services and the Director of Legal Services for
an agreement to secure ongoing maintenance of the drinking fountain.
Note to Applicant: Condition 1.3 seeks relocation of the drinking
fountain to public property.
A.2.21 show
A.3 Standard
A.3.1 an acoustical consultant's report shall
be submitted which assesses noise impacts on the site (by the development)
and recommends noise mitigation measures in order to achieve noise criteria.
A.3.2 confirmation is supplied by the applicant
that the acoustical measures will be incorporated into the final design,
based on the consultant's recommendations as concurred with or amended
by the Medical Health Officer (Senior Environmental Health Officer).
A.3.3 confirmation is supplied by the applicant
that adequate and effective acoustic separation will be provided between
the commercial and residential portions of the building.
A.3.4 confirmation is supplied by the applicant
that mechanical (ventilators, generators, compactors and exhaust systems)
will be designed and located to minimize the noise impact on the neighbourhood
and to comply with Noise By-law #6555
A.4 Standard Licenses & Inspections (Environmental
Protection Branch) Conditions:
A.4.1 arrangements to be made to the satisfaction of the Manager of the
Environmental Protection Branch and the Director of Legal Services,
prior to issuance of a development permit, for an on-site and off-site
soils agreement;
A.4.2 issuance of a Certificate of Compliance from the Ministry of Water,
Land and Air Protection is required prior to occupancy.
[top]
B.1.1 The applicant is advised to note the
comments of the Processing Centre-Building, Vancouver Coastal Health
Authority and Fire and Rescue Services Departments contained in the
Staff Committee Report dated
B.1.2 It should be noted that if conditions
1.0 and 2.0 have not been complied with on or before
B.1.3 This approval is subject to any change
in the Official Development Plan and the Zoning and Development Bylaw
or other regulations affecting the development that occurs before
the permit is issuable. No permit
that contravenes the bylaw or regulations can be issued.
B.1.4 Revised drawings will not be accepted
unless they fulfill all conditions noted above. Further,
written explanation describing point-by-point how conditions have
been met, must accompany revised drawings. An
appointment should be made with the Project Facilitator when the revised
drawings are ready for submission.
B.1.5 A new development application will be
required for any significant changes other than those required by the
above-noted conditions.
B.2 Conditions of Development Permit:
B.2.3 Any phasing of the development, other
than that specifically approved, that results in an interruption of
continuous construction to completion of the development, will require
application to amend the development to determine the interim treatment
of the incomplete portions of the site to ensure that the phased development
functions are as set out in the approved plans, all to the satisfaction
of the Director of Planning.
B.2.5 This
site is affected by the Development Cost Levy By-law No 8149. Levies will be required to be paid prior to
issuance of Building Permits.
[top]
Fire and
Rescue Services Comments
2) Project covers entire city block bounded by Cambie
St to west,
3)*Dwgs A205 & A206 indicate a number of residential lobbies and other entrances to various tenant spaces in building. This may be due to size of building and to the fact that there is a difference in elevation of approx 14'. Clarification required.
4)*Single building requires single stage fire alarm system. FAS to be reviewed with City Electrical Engineer.
5)*Principal entrance/address (fire dept response) must be within 15m (49') from street curb. There appears to be multiple fire dept response points to this building. Identify principal entrance to building. Note: Fire Dept responds to street address. Too many response points to this single building may be totally confusing for responding fire fighters (if bells ringing throughout the building).
6)*From Fire Dept response point, direct access required to above and below grade levels per 3.2.5.20. VBBL.
7)*Where does fire dept respond for U/G parkade? Note: Parkade is continuous under entire building and smoke movement would be a concern. This is a high building.
8)*Dwg A207 indicates residential units facing W 7th. Fire Dept access required. Review exiting from second floor with Processing Centre - Building.
11) There was a meeting held
12)*There are too many fire department response points proposed.
13)*Fire Alarm System MUST be reviewed with City Electrical Engineer. This is an extremely complex project for fire department response.
Processing
Centre-Building Comments
[top]
|
|
Questions or Comments? E-mail: carol_hubbard@city.vancouver.bc.ca
|